Comments on: If not Jerry, then who? http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/ No longer in business (but feel free to look around). Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:13:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Bryan Watson http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-485 Bryan Watson Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:23:06 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-485 The reason his game management did not work is because he did not have a strong enough defence to support it. The Boys won 3 Superbowl like that but the D was much better. Until we get better inside linebacker play and allow our outside LB to rush the passer (and not drop into coverage in the flat) we will never have a solid D. The reason his game management did not work is because he did not have a strong enough defence to support it. The Boys won 3 Superbowl like that but the D was much better. Until we get better inside linebacker play and allow our outside LB to rush the passer (and not drop into coverage in the flat) we will never have a solid D.

]]> By: Luis http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-484 Luis Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:08:27 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-484 You're definitely right about that. Jerry doesn't just need to remove himself as GM. He needs to completely remove himself out of football operations. The team owner needs to be as transparent as possible. Not sure if that's possible with Jerry. But one can dream, right?<br><br>As for Bill, he was a good short-term solution. But that Tuna began to spoil before our very eyes. His game management left a lot to be desired, so he had to go. I just wished he'd take a front office position with the Cowboys, but I figured he wouldn't do anything but coach. Imagine my dismay when he took up that position with Miami and took away our most important coach. You're definitely right about that. Jerry doesn't just need to remove himself as GM. He needs to completely remove himself out of football operations. The team owner needs to be as transparent as possible. Not sure if that's possible with Jerry. But one can dream, right?

As for Bill, he was a good short-term solution. But that Tuna began to spoil before our very eyes. His game management left a lot to be desired, so he had to go. I just wished he'd take a front office position with the Cowboys, but I figured he wouldn't do anything but coach. Imagine my dismay when he took up that position with Miami and took away our most important coach.

]]> By: Bryan Watson http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-483 Bryan Watson Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:54:36 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-483 We basically had a GM here for 4 years with Big Bill. The problem with him and any other guy that we get in here is that even if they had the GM Title, we would not be able to get Jerry out of the mix. Bill did not want TO or Tank Johnson for example. Bill had a great year 1 with Miami. Until Jerry removes himself from those decisions, we will have the same result with or without a GM. We basically had a GM here for 4 years with Big Bill. The problem with him and any other guy that we get in here is that even if they had the GM Title, we would not be able to get Jerry out of the mix. Bill did not want TO or Tank Johnson for example. Bill had a great year 1 with Miami. Until Jerry removes himself from those decisions, we will have the same result with or without a GM.

]]> By: Bryan Watson http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-261 Bryan Watson Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:23:06 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-261 The reason his game management did not work is because he did not have a strong enough defence to support it. The Boys won 3 Superbowl like that but the D was much better. Until we get better inside linebacker play and allow our outside LB to rush the passer (and not drop into coverage in the flat) we will never have a solid D. The reason his game management did not work is because he did not have a strong enough defence to support it. The Boys won 3 Superbowl like that but the D was much better. Until we get better inside linebacker play and allow our outside LB to rush the passer (and not drop into coverage in the flat) we will never have a solid D.

]]> By: Luis http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-260 Luis Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:08:27 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-260 You're definitely right about that. Jerry doesn't just need to remove himself as GM. He needs to completely remove himself out of football operations. The team owner needs to be as transparent as possible. Not sure if that's possible with Jerry. But one can dream, right?<br><br>As for Bill, he was a good short-term solution. But that Tuna began to spoil before our very eyes. His game management left a lot to be desired, so he had to go. I just wished he'd take a front office position with the Cowboys, but I figured he wouldn't do anything but coach. Imagine my dismay when he took up that position with Miami and took away our most important coach. You're definitely right about that. Jerry doesn't just need to remove himself as GM. He needs to completely remove himself out of football operations. The team owner needs to be as transparent as possible. Not sure if that's possible with Jerry. But one can dream, right?

As for Bill, he was a good short-term solution. But that Tuna began to spoil before our very eyes. His game management left a lot to be desired, so he had to go. I just wished he'd take a front office position with the Cowboys, but I figured he wouldn't do anything but coach. Imagine my dismay when he took up that position with Miami and took away our most important coach.

]]> By: Bryan Watson http://firejerryjones.com/2009/04/if-not-jerry-then-who/comment-page-1/#comment-259 Bryan Watson Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:54:36 +0000 http://firejerryjones.com/?p=470#comment-259 We basically had a GM here for 4 years with Big Bill. The problem with him and any other guy that we get in here is that even if they had the GM Title, we would not be able to get Jerry out of the mix. Bill did not want TO or Tank Johnson for example. Bill had a great year 1 with Miami. Until Jerry removes himself from those decisions, we will have the same result with or without a GM. We basically had a GM here for 4 years with Big Bill. The problem with him and any other guy that we get in here is that even if they had the GM Title, we would not be able to get Jerry out of the mix. Bill did not want TO or Tank Johnson for example. Bill had a great year 1 with Miami. Until Jerry removes himself from those decisions, we will have the same result with or without a GM.

]]>